|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.12 19:40:43 -
[1] - Quote
Incompetent - 3 Unknown - 4 Corrupt - 12 Good - 7
This is literally worse than T3 group. I guess for the next group CCP bias will finally get full power, and corrupt people finally get the majority they need to get rid of everything threatening their bot empires in eve. |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 10:14:49 -
[2] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Orca Platypus wrote:Incompetent - 3 Unknown - 4 Corrupt - 12 Good - 7
This is literally worse than T3 group. I guess for the next group CCP bias will finally get full power, and corrupt people finally get the majority they need to get rid of everything threatening their bot empires in eve. Oh come ON. There has to be some overlap. I am sure at least one person is incompetent, unknown AND corrupt. m
You are the overlap of Incompetent, Corrupt and Vegetable, Mike. Is there anything you do at all, except listening to your gewn masters and trying to be smug on forums? |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 10:16:41 -
[3] - Quote
5pitf1re wrote:I wasn't aware that being known or famous would be a requirement for experience. TIL. Unknown only means I wasn't able to draw a conclusion based on killboards, posting and corp history to reliably place a person within any other group. It doesn't mean nobody knows a guy, it's his intentions that are unknown. |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 10:19:14 -
[4] - Quote
Lazarus Telraven wrote:I know I'm not very well known, but to put me in the unknown list hurts my feelings :\ You are not known at all, but your affiliation has clearly placed you within a group, intentions of which are definitely not unknown. |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 10:44:22 -
[5] - Quote
Wish I could take a peek at the clawing of two corrupt groups with conflicting intentions...
Gewnie intentions reek from miles away: 1) Protect the blessed jump range reduction that keeps Deklein out of hotdrop range. 2) Secure and expand the capital ratting, flourishing as a consequence of 1). 3) Preserve and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for ratting capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into defensive N+1 superweapons to secure the irl income sources until eve dies.
Pathetic Legion intentions clash with the former: 1) Undo Phoebe, because butthurt. 2) Secure and expand dropping capitals on rifters, as a consequence of 1) 3) Obtain and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for moving capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into offensive N+1 superweapons to secure the tear income sources until eve dies.
They will quickly push for the respective 3) together, forming a corrupt coalition, but the following ego clash over the rest of the respective agendas would probably be fun to see. |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 12:57:51 -
[6] - Quote
Lazarus Telraven wrote:I am going to refrain trolling the **** out of you because it would be too easy. That's right, go back to your ratting nyx.
Lazarus Telraven wrote:1.) If you could take the tin foil hat off for a few seconds and look at some of the things I have said in regards to supers you will know I am one of the biggest advocates for fixing supers so that small groups can operate moderately safely with them. Especially the guys and gals trying to move their super through lowsec. (I can move my supers through lowsec because I have a fleet of 100 of them)
2.) the 'Gewnies' don't care about 'protecting deklein' most of our active ratters enjoy the combat when they get tackled, check MoA and NCdot killboard for the past months you will see that Deklein isn't some safe mecca.
3.) You can currently make more isk doing HiSec incursions with complete safety.
4.) There is a wide variety of different viewpoints in this group from many different parts of EVE.
5.) You have no idea what the top level of this games motives are as shown by your 8 bullet points. No one wants EVE to die.
6.) The #1 goal of everyone I know is for capitals to have a reason to be fielded thus being put at risk for pvp purposes.
7.) The logs of the slack channel will be logged and made public so everyone will know whats going in.
1) Yep, in full accordance with Pathetic Legion point 3), you already push for safety mechanics when moving supers. So far you're supporting my call. 2) Sure, sure. Gewn tears are always tasty, keep them coming. I not only read the killboards, but also the MoA mail section, you know. So much "enjoyment" there, oh my. Just remembering the interceptor tears... yum! 3) "Nerf hisec". Now we're back to citating gewn forum crying guidelines. The incursion point has been refuted many times, update your guidelines already. 4) I never denied variety. I just stated a fact that within this group there is a corrupt cell which has ulterior motives. 5) Sure, sure. Not to die, just to be milked to the bone at the expense of everything else. And then die. 6) The #1 goal of your corrupt party is to remove any and all risk to your $$$. Don't bother denying the obvious, you've been at it for years. 7) So what? You'll get a deal under the table with the other corrupt party and both make a push for priorities I stated, with a fake agenda - maybe the usual "help the little guy" or something more fitting to the cause, I don't really care to take apart the double face charade here. I just state that the double face will appear, and for whatever fake reasoning it bring, will push towards the priorities I stated. |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 13:17:54 -
[7] - Quote
FT Diomedes wrote:You certainly were not on his "Good" list... You forgot "...and for a good reason". People who drop whole regions of content to hole up where drops can't reach them, surrounding themselves with fake targets like renters from those who come like the real men - don't deserve to be anywhere near the good list. |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 18:18:51 -
[8] - Quote
Lazarus Telraven wrote:We have some open space in Pure Blind if you're looking to rent, good price and I will personally protect your space from all of the bad guys. Will definitely settle around when gewnies are evicted, just to personally protect my space from all the gewn guys. Thanks for the offer.
Lazarus Telraven wrote:What should I have for breakfast you guys seem to know a lot about me. I mean I don't know much, I typically sit in deklein for 6-8 hours a day ratting on my 3 alts. And you still can't deny that's what your whole coalition does more than anything else. |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 18:31:26 -
[9] - Quote
xttz wrote:Orca Platypus wrote:Wish I could take a peek at the clawing of two corrupt groups with conflicting intentions...
Gewnie intentions reek from miles away: 1) Protect the blessed jump range reduction that keeps Deklein out of hotdrop range. 2) Secure and expand the capital ratting, flourishing as a consequence of 1). 3) Preserve and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for ratting capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into defensive N+1 superweapons to secure the irl income sources until eve dies.
As it happens, some points I personally plan to advocate in the focus group are: 1) Increase jump range and nerf watchlist to bring back hotdrop/counter-drop play, but keep a version of the current system to prevent people to cross the map super-fast. 2) Carrier ratting is dumb as hell and needs to die in a fire. 3) See above 4) Supercaps should be an inspirational part of the game that drives people to both field them and kill them, without returning to being an N+1 apex ship. The logs will all be public too.
1) In full accordance with corrupt party goals - both empower hotdrops and safety mechanics. I see the undertable dealing is going full steam. 2) To be replaced with supercapital ratting your coalition does? Or maybe dread ratting? I don't really care what you say on the issue though, your coalition would simply threaten to kick you if anything you say won't go in accordance with their "rat for the $$$ god" agenda, so either way you'll have it worked out with your master. 3) see above (1) 4) And then you're going to say there was no way to do anything else with them but make them into defensive N+1 superweapons because any other way they won't be inspirational part of the only game your coalition knows - the sanctum farming game. |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 20:04:28 -
[10] - Quote
OriginalName IV wrote:I'm really pleased that somebody else thinks im incompetent. The way you can locate yourself is the best proof of correct placement. Let me know what your agenda is, and I'll gladly correct myself placing you into corrupt group. |
|
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.15 07:06:53 -
[11] - Quote
RoCkEt X wrote:What group do i come under? LOL
Your allegiance clearly places you within Corrupt. Your wall of text was nothing but meaningless bunch of crap until chapter 3, which revealed it all to be nothing more than crying to nerf already minimal and borderline pointless fatigue to a completely meaningless token mechanic state. This is also in line with your allegiance agenda, which confirms your placement as Corrupt.
I have no evidence that you belong in any other group more than to the current.
Scott Ormands wrote:I'm also curious where I come in. Fake curiosity reeks, you know. |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.15 16:24:27 -
[12] - Quote
RoCkEt X wrote:You're an idiot... LOL Dear CCP, please note the level of argumentation presented by the one you chose as focus group participant. If anyone asks, I'm for booting. |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.15 20:56:43 -
[13] - Quote
5pitf1re wrote:Orca Platypus wrote:5pitf1re wrote:I'm fairly sure he means AFK carrier ratting and I agree with it. AFK farming activities should die in a fire. So when do moons depart from eve, again? I'm not going to defend the afk activities, but dishing out on all of them indiscriminately will give you a bad dialectic stance. Of course there is no way to get rid of all the AFK farming options. Mining being one of them. It would involve profound mechanical changes which also means human resources. I also like the discussions around NPCs becoming smarter, possibly using the burner mission AI everywhere in EVE, that would be really cool.
Mining in a fleet is by no way an afk activity. Rocks pop, cargohold overflows every 2.5 minutes, and somebody has to haul. If you only know how to mine solo and presumably afk - your problem, don't ruin it for people who know how interaction intensive a real mining is. Afkarrier and afktar are indeed afk though. Feel free to wreck.
Frostys Virpio wrote:They could of just removed the "feature" that drone auto attack enemies and be done with this stupidity tho. ECM really needs buffs that badly? |
|
|
|